<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Politics and the NPC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinayouren.com/en/2009/03/13/1744/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2009/03/13/1744</link>
	<description>Of China changing the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caonima! The double meeting is here agan! &#124; CHINAYOUREN</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2009/03/13/1744/comment-page-1#comment-20994</link>
		<dc:creator>Caonima! The double meeting is here agan! &#124; CHINAYOUREN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=1744#comment-20994</guid>
		<description>[...] Oriental Morning Post of Shanghai is doing a nice coverage of the annual NPC-CPPCC meetings this year. I liked today&#8217;s paper edition in particular, which carried a couple of cute [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oriental Morning Post of Shanghai is doing a nice coverage of the annual NPC-CPPCC meetings this year. I liked today&#8217;s paper edition in particular, which carried a couple of cute [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China: Resumen de la Semana (3) &#124; CHINAYOUREN</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2009/03/13/1744/comment-page-1#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>China: Resumen de la Semana (3) &#124; CHINAYOUREN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=1744#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>[...] 2009 es el anyo de los aniversarios. Entre otras cosas, hay aniversarios de: 60 anyos de la Republica Popular, 20 anyos de revueltas de Tiananmen, 50 anyos desde que huyo el Dalai Lama, etc. Ademas, es el 0 aniversario de la Crisis economica, y aunque China esta mejor de lo que pensabamos, nadie sabe verdaderamente donde va a parar todo esto. Es comprensible por tanto que las autoridades esten un poco nerviosas, y ultimamente la censura en internet y las reacciones del gobierno se notan algo mas cerradas, como vimos la semana pasada. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2009 es el anyo de los aniversarios. Entre otras cosas, hay aniversarios de: 60 anyos de la Republica Popular, 20 anyos de revueltas de Tiananmen, 50 anyos desde que huyo el Dalai Lama, etc. Ademas, es el 0 aniversario de la Crisis economica, y aunque China esta mejor de lo que pensabamos, nadie sabe verdaderamente donde va a parar todo esto. Es comprensible por tanto que las autoridades esten un poco nerviosas, y ultimamente la censura en internet y las reacciones del gobierno se notan algo mas cerradas, como vimos la semana pasada. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uln</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2009/03/13/1744/comment-page-1#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>uln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=1744#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>It is true that when you see both articles they are not necessarily in conflict. You can understand Wen&#039;s &quot;democracy&quot; as &quot;socialist democracy&quot;, and then they are just two different ways to call the same thing.

And yet, the tone of the messages is completely different. One insist on what they will NOT do, the other insists on what they want to do. Top leaders in China don&#039;t usually do direct public statements against each other, they express their support in more subtle ways. And lately, reactions (or lack thereof) to Wen&#039;s statements  sound very much like lack of support.

Again, all this is no more than an informed guess, and my information is no more than my following through Xinhua and PDaily. But I don&#039;t think there is any problem with the reasoning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that when you see both articles they are not necessarily in conflict. You can understand Wen&#8217;s &#8220;democracy&#8221; as &#8220;socialist democracy&#8221;, and then they are just two different ways to call the same thing.</p>
<p>And yet, the tone of the messages is completely different. One insist on what they will NOT do, the other insists on what they want to do. Top leaders in China don&#8217;t usually do direct public statements against each other, they express their support in more subtle ways. And lately, reactions (or lack thereof) to Wen&#8217;s statements  sound very much like lack of support.</p>
<p>Again, all this is no more than an informed guess, and my information is no more than my following through Xinhua and PDaily. But I don&#8217;t think there is any problem with the reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 胡让之</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2009/03/13/1744/comment-page-1#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>胡让之</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=1744#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>Interesting.

But one point is missing: Re-affirming things like no western style democracy by Wu and insisting on political reform by Wen does not conflict each other from the pointof logical reasoning. 

It is too quick to make any deduction that Wu and Wen are on different terms. They can say that they are talking about two different aspects. 

Probably you have a great point, but it&#039;s not great reasoning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>But one point is missing: Re-affirming things like no western style democracy by Wu and insisting on political reform by Wen does not conflict each other from the pointof logical reasoning. </p>
<p>It is too quick to make any deduction that Wu and Wen are on different terms. They can say that they are talking about two different aspects. </p>
<p>Probably you have a great point, but it&#8217;s not great reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uln</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2009/03/13/1744/comment-page-1#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator>uln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=1744#comment-1096</guid>
		<description>Haha. It is a long time I don&#039;t see Charles around here. It is a pity, because I quite liked how he heated the discussion. His favourite phrase was: &quot;you say you like China, but in fact you hate it&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. It is a long time I don&#8217;t see Charles around here. It is a pity, because I quite liked how he heated the discussion. His favourite phrase was: &#8220;you say you like China, but in fact you hate it&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FOARP</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2009/03/13/1744/comment-page-1#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>FOARP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=1744#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>Good analysis. It&#039;s too easy to see the CCP as a monolith power block - not least because mostly that is what it is, but there are divisions. I wonder whether Charles Liu is going to try to argue that China is still a democracy now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis. It&#8217;s too easy to see the CCP as a monolith power block &#8211; not least because mostly that is what it is, but there are divisions. I wonder whether Charles Liu is going to try to argue that China is still a democracy now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
