<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Buzz blocked in China!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983</link>
	<description>Of China changing the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julen Madariaga</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-23531</link>
		<dc:creator>Julen Madariaga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 19:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-23531</guid>
		<description>Not sure they cannot block Buzz. It is easier than you think, they only need to block &quot;buzz&quot; string on the URL.

But I agree individual buzz posts are difficult to handle because of https.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure they cannot block Buzz. It is easier than you think, they only need to block &#8220;buzz&#8221; string on the URL.</p>
<p>But I agree individual buzz posts are difficult to handle because of https.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ev</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-23524</link>
		<dc:creator>ev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 13:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-23524</guid>
		<description>fwiw, it&#039;s not technically possible to block google buzz and not block gmail.

it&#039;s also not possible to block google buzz in profiles via SSL like this:
https://www.google.com/profiles/113506941426753247014#buzz

or direct links to buzz
https://www.google.com/buzz/113506941426753247014/jGW4mtHgWhK/Will-China-block-Google-Buzz-http-bit-ly-c7pCGc

and not block the login URL for google:
https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin

so it&#039;s sort of... you either block ALL google services that require you to login, or you don&#039;t block them at all.

It has passed a lot of time since buzz appeared and it hasn&#039;t been blocked.

So what could China do?

I don&#039;t think China will implement DPI in their censors.. also, unless China makes a huuuuge propaganda campaign against Google, people wont like it if they suddenly can&#039;t use any of google&#039;s services.

It really amazes me that it hasn&#039;t been blocked so far.. I hope it stays like this :), give china a dose of censorship-free information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fwiw, it&#8217;s not technically possible to block google buzz and not block gmail.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s also not possible to block google buzz in profiles via SSL like this:<br />
<a href="https://www.google.com/profiles/113506941426753247014#buzz" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/profiles/113506941426753247014#buzz</a></p>
<p>or direct links to buzz<br />
<a href="https://www.google.com/buzz/113506941426753247014/jGW4mtHgWhK/Will-China-block-Google-Buzz-http-bit-ly-c7pCGc" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/buzz/113506941426753247014/jGW4mtHgWhK/Will-China-block-Google-Buzz-http-bit-ly-c7pCGc</a></p>
<p>and not block the login URL for google:<br />
<a href="https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin</a></p>
<p>so it&#8217;s sort of&#8230; you either block ALL google services that require you to login, or you don&#8217;t block them at all.</p>
<p>It has passed a lot of time since buzz appeared and it hasn&#8217;t been blocked.</p>
<p>So what could China do?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think China will implement DPI in their censors.. also, unless China makes a huuuuge propaganda campaign against Google, people wont like it if they suddenly can&#8217;t use any of google&#8217;s services.</p>
<p>It really amazes me that it hasn&#8217;t been blocked so far.. I hope it stays like this <img src='http://chinayouren.com/en/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> , give china a dose of censorship-free information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uln</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20941</link>
		<dc:creator>Uln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20941</guid>
		<description>Gunthers, thanks for the link, I had already published it myself in the mini-Youren (on the right column of my blog)
It is indeed a very interesting article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunthers, thanks for the link, I had already published it myself in the mini-Youren (on the right column of my blog)<br />
It is indeed a very interesting article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunthers</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20928</link>
		<dc:creator>gunthers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20928</guid>
		<description>just passing on a link...

Publish and be deleted - Global Times
http://special.globaltimes.cn/2010-02/508093.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just passing on a link&#8230;</p>
<p>Publish and be deleted &#8211; Global Times<br />
<a href="http://special.globaltimes.cn/2010-02/508093.html" rel="nofollow">http://special.globaltimes.cn/2010-02/508093.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Travel Trends-Reaching the Chinese Travel Market Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; China can&#8217;t control the net for ever</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20892</link>
		<dc:creator>China Travel Trends-Reaching the Chinese Travel Market Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; China can&#8217;t control the net for ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20892</guid>
		<description>[...] And here is an interesting article from China Youren about the anticipated fate of Google Buzz: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And here is an interesting article from China Youren about the anticipated fate of Google Buzz: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uln</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20742</link>
		<dc:creator>Uln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20742</guid>
		<description>Giom &amp; Tim: 

I think the main problem with my post is in the reaction time. As I already observed before, GFW is usually not very fast. Quick patches do exist, and sometimes single pages get blocked within a day of appearance, but most of the times there are long delays. 

This explains why blocked bloggers usually don&#039;t know WHAT exactly made them get GFWd. For example, this site was blocked in June at a time where I had spent almost a month offline, and adding no political content for weeks before that. It must have been on the GFW queue for many weeks before.

Anyway, I am glad I reserved that 10% for hedging :) It might still take a few weeks, but I have no doubt that pretty soon we will see some movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giom &#038; Tim: </p>
<p>I think the main problem with my post is in the reaction time. As I already observed before, GFW is usually not very fast. Quick patches do exist, and sometimes single pages get blocked within a day of appearance, but most of the times there are long delays. </p>
<p>This explains why blocked bloggers usually don&#8217;t know WHAT exactly made them get GFWd. For example, this site was blocked in June at a time where I had spent almost a month offline, and adding no political content for weeks before that. It must have been on the GFW queue for many weeks before.</p>
<p>Anyway, I am glad I reserved that 10% for hedging <img src='http://chinayouren.com/en/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It might still take a few weeks, but I have no doubt that pretty soon we will see some movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uln</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20741</link>
		<dc:creator>Uln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20741</guid>
		<description>@kiLLiwatch: Sure, there are many solutions like TOR, proxies, etc. 

But the problem here is not technical, it is practical: these solutions all require action by the end user (ie. install/open proxy, etc.). And the majority of the end users will NOT take any positive action to be able to get to GBuzz, because they are still not &quot;addicted&quot; to it. So of course, GBuzz will continue to work behind the GFW, (just like Facebook now) but with a very reduced impact, and no chances to expand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kiLLiwatch: Sure, there are many solutions like TOR, proxies, etc. </p>
<p>But the problem here is not technical, it is practical: these solutions all require action by the end user (ie. install/open proxy, etc.). And the majority of the end users will NOT take any positive action to be able to get to GBuzz, because they are still not &#8220;addicted&#8221; to it. So of course, GBuzz will continue to work behind the GFW, (just like Facebook now) but with a very reduced impact, and no chances to expand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20732</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20732</guid>
		<description>Thankfully, looks like your timeline was wrong, but I&#039;m still with you on the end result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thankfully, looks like your timeline was wrong, but I&#8217;m still with you on the end result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giom</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20701</link>
		<dc:creator>Giom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 01:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20701</guid>
		<description>Hmm, seems it is still there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, seems it is still there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChinaGeeks &#187; Twitter: Is it a Trap?</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20575</link>
		<dc:creator>ChinaGeeks &#187; Twitter: Is it a Trap?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20575</guid>
		<description>[...] (and you can add Google Buzz to the list of services like that Chinese dissidents are using, at least for the moment) provides a pretty unprecedented opportunity for would-be prosecutors to compile evidence of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (and you can add Google Buzz to the list of services like that Chinese dissidents are using, at least for the moment) provides a pretty unprecedented opportunity for would-be prosecutors to compile evidence of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China blogs: New year greetings, Buzz&#8217;s buzz, Han Han on Confucius :: Go Chengdoo &#124; Manufacturer China</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20563</link>
		<dc:creator>China blogs: New year greetings, Buzz&#8217;s buzz, Han Han on Confucius :: Go Chengdoo &#124; Manufacturer China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20563</guid>
		<description>[...] Buzz, Google&#8217;s new email-integrated, Twitter-like product, is throwing people into a tizzy regarding privacy concerns, and after the Google vs. PRC standoff against censorship, Buzz&#8217;s implications for Chinese activists is under particular scrutiny. And while everyone else is asking if Buzz will survive the Great Firewall, Uln at Chinayouren has already predicted the software&#8217;s downfall in China. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Buzz, Google&#8217;s new email-integrated, Twitter-like product, is throwing people into a tizzy regarding privacy concerns, and after the Google vs. PRC standoff against censorship, Buzz&#8217;s implications for Chinese activists is under particular scrutiny. And while everyone else is asking if Buzz will survive the Great Firewall, Uln at Chinayouren has already predicted the software&#8217;s downfall in China. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiLLiwatch</title>
		<link>http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/02/12/2983/comment-page-1#comment-20554</link>
		<dc:creator>kiLLiwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chinayouren.com/en/?p=2983#comment-20554</guid>
		<description>A solution can be tunneling your traffic through the Tor network, which adds three layers of encryption as it goes through three nodes. The exit router can not know for who the traffic is, he only knows the middle node. The middle node knows the first and the exit but doesnt know the client
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tor.eff.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tor.eff.org
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A solution can be tunneling your traffic through the Tor network, which adds three layers of encryption as it goes through three nodes. The exit router can not know for who the traffic is, he only knows the middle node. The middle node knows the first and the exit but doesnt know the client<br />
<a href="http://tor.eff.org" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://tor.eff.org" rel="nofollow">http://tor.eff.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
